Make your own free website on Tripod.com
ISOCT
Princess Diana-Gate

Home

Latest News Stories
I-Spy Predictions
Space Science, Solar Weather, Superstorms, Earthquakes, Tsunami
Mini Poll
Photo Intrigue
Humour
Contact Editor
Canadian Story Archives
International Story Archives
Links
Avian Flu Bird Massacre
Climate Change - The Coming Ice Age - Government Press Releases

mvc-034f.jpg
Photo © Yvonne Seifert

Diana's Bizarre Ambulance Ride

Diana's ambulance ride took between one and two hours to travel 6 kilometers, 4 miles, to hospital. Why has no one focused on this platform of inquiry?

Witnesses stated driver, Henri Paul, was not consuming alcohol or intoxicated, which contradicts later claims.
Trevor Rees-Jones (Diana's bodyguard) was quoted as saying Diana was conscious after the crash and cried out for Dodi Fayed, who was already dead. He also maintained the chauffeur, who was found to be three times over the French drunk-driving limit, was not visibly drunk when they left the Ritz Hotel.
The account bore similarities to statements by Al Fayed, (Dodi's father) the multimillionaire owner of the London department store Harrods.

The reality is that Princess Diana was not dead after the accident. She was very much alive and talking.
Was this information later tampered with?

The hospital to which she was taken, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, was 4 miles (6 kilometers) from the accident, occurring after midnight on a holiday weekend, with many away and the city streets quiet.

There has been no focus by the media on the at minimum, one hour, ambulance ride to travel 4 miles.

Diana slipped into death during the ridiculously long ambulance ride to the hospital, accompanied by a physician to boot. If her pulmonary artery was injured as claimed, she would have literally died within seconds, and would have been in a coma at the very minimum, albeit brief!

Le Parisien and Reuters reported that during the ambulance trip, the ambulance stopped to give her a massive injection of adrenaline. Why would an ambulance have to stop moving through traffic to implememnt this procedure? Bizarre at best! Later on, the hospital asserted Diana received no injection of adrenaline during the ambulance ride.What did transpire? What happened during an inordinate one hour trip with a VIP on board?

Le Parisien and Reuters further reported that the Interior Minister, Jean-Pierre Chevenement, and the police chief for Paris, France, Phillippe Massoni, two of the most powerful figures in the land, were mystified about the whereabouts of the ambulance due to its failure to reach the hospital within a resonable amount of time.Was this physician put in place by the Queen or Prince Charles? Did Diana linger longer than had orininally been hoped? Were they under orders not to arrive at the hospital so as to ensure the proper people were in place to finish the job?

Assuming that ambulances in Paris, France in 1997 have radios or phones, answer why two men, among the most powerful in France, couldn't pick up a telephone and get an answer to the mystery.

Further, consider why an ambulance with the princess of Whales onboard was sent without a police escort!

Why isn't the media or the Queen herself actively and aggressively pursuing this important matter? If a parent found out it took one hour for an ambulance with his or her child to travel four miles after midnight to a hospital, would the parent be justified in being quite angry and entitled to know what happened. If that child was Prince William, would the focus of the inquiry be different than it apparently is with Diana? Would the English newspapers, and others throughout the world, declare: 'One Hour to Get to the Hospital!'

With billions of people throughout the planet interested in Diana's death and the cause thereof, it is a deep mystery as to why the focus of investigators and media circumvent this critical area of inquiry, which paradoxically seemed to be a mystery to the French Interior Minister and the Police Chief of Paris as well.

Why did Prince Charles, the one person who despised Diana and was trying to destroy her through scandal, and justify his lifelong affair with Camilla Parker Bowls have to be the one person to pick up her body and escort it back to Britain? Diana didn't seem to need a police escort in the ambulance, yet after death she needed the Prince Of Whales to ride with her body? And don't we know that if The Royals WANTED to find a little white Fiat, they of all people in the world, could do it?

Did Camilla and Charles have a previous arrangement that Charles would please the queen and honor his duties by providing and heir and a spare? And how many abortions was Diana forced to have before she produced "only sons?"

It was no secret that Charles' affair was going on prior to, during, and after the wedding. The world was well aware of Charles' taste for the horrendous looking woman.
It would have been completely unacceptable for Charles to have children with Camilla. Is it entirely likely that he could have had plans to later remove Diana, any way he could? Was Diana a walking dead woman the moment the royal family laid eyes on her? Was she chosen to produce sons, and then expire?

Mohamed Al Fayed (Dodi's father) repeatedly tried to gain British citizenship and was turned down. Was the queen so afraid that this egyptian family would somehow get close to the two little princes, that she kept tabs on Diana? And did the queen not only learn of Dodi and Diana's engagement, but also learn that Diana may have been preganant with his child,and the obvious implications of that were intolerable?
A collective report by four top pathologists have declared in legal documents, that it is highly unusual to commence any embalming on a body prior to autopsy. They cite that in cases where pregnancy tests were required, any embalming would more than likely offer a positive result. So why was Diana partially embalmed in the Paris hospital before any post mortem?

Did The queen's secret service collect Diana's urine from toilets and test it frequently for preganancy? And was the emblaming done before any tests could be performed so as to create the illusion that it was indeed the embalming procedure that caused a false positive test for pregnancy?

Did the royals know in advance that Diana was pregnant, and in order to cover up that fact they needed to create another reason for a positive pregancy test? This would be a well planned, calculated scheme, which could only have been carried out by someone very, very, high in authority? For who would dare to embalm a princess without license to do so?

By A. Longson


Egyptian lawyer is suing the Queen and Prime Minister Tony Blair for damages, alleging they conspired to kill Diana, Princess of Wales, because she was in love with a Muslim.

The BBC reports the case is expected to be heard in a Cairo court in January 1998.

Lawyer Nabih Alwahsi is seeking damages of $170,000 from both the Queen and Mr Blair.

He says they plotted to murder the Princess because they were embarrassed by her love affair with an Egyptian Muslim.

He also says the British establishment was determined to prevent a Muslim from becoming step-father to the future King.

In his deposition, Mr Alwahsi said he thought England was the champion of democracy and religious freedom and he was so disillusioned after the accident, only a court case could ease his psychological pain.

The case has already been delayed once by the judge so British officials in Cairo could have time to inform authorities in London. However, they do not appear to have bothered.

A British spokesman in Cairo says the Embassy has not received any formal notice of the case.

New York Times excerpt:


MOHAMED AL FAYED accused the Duke of Edinburgh of masterminding the murder of Diana, Princess of Wales, Michael Howard, the former Home Secretary, of taking a 1.5 million bribe and Neil Hamilton of hiring "rent boys" during a day of what were described as "wild and groundless" allegations in the High Court.

On the third day of Mr Hamilton's libel action against the Harrods owner, Mr Al Fayed was accused by Desmond Browne, QC, for the former minister, of making up allegations as he went along. Mr Al Fayed, during cross-examination, challenged the Duke to sue him over allegations that he masterminded a plot to murder the Princess and Dodi Fayed.

He also repeated claims that Dominic Lawson, Editor of The Sunday Telegraph, is an MI6 agent.

Mr Browne said that, to give substance to his conspiracy theory over the Paris car crash that killed the couple, Mr Al Fayed had "quite falsely on a number of occasions" accused the Duke of Edinburgh of "masterminding" it.

Mr Browne: "Did you not say that Prince Philip had masterminded it because he has German blood and Nazi views?"

Mr Al Fayed: "I have the right to say what I feel . . . the Editor of The Sunday Telegraph definitely works for MI6 . . . his brother-in-law works for MI6 . . . these are the people who control democracy in this country. Let MI5 and MI6 sue me. Let Prince Philip sue me, then I will go through everything. They killed my son."

Mr Al Fayed denied that Henri Paul, the driver of the car in which the couple were killed, was drunk at the time of the crash.

Mr Browne: "He was three times over the French driving limit, was he not?"

Mr Al Fayed: "That is not true . . . his blood was changed in the mortuary, Henri Paul was on the MI6 files for three years."

Diana Documentary Raises New Crash Doubts.
Attorney General halts MI5 appearance.

A NEW documentary raises fresh doubts over
the crash that killed Diana , Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed.

Di's former lover James Hewitt claims he was approached by secret
agents prior to the crash telling him to stop seeing the Princess
or he would meet the same fate as a former bodyguard who died in
"mysterious circumstances".

The program claims there is new evidence regarding driver Henri Paul.
Substantial untraceable payments were made to Paul's account in the months
leading up to the crash. Unusually high levels of carbon monoxide were
found in his body. Blood samples taken from the dead Paul appeared to have
been tampered with claims the film.

An appearance in the documentary by MI5 man David Shayler has been withdrawn.
The Government's chief lawyer, The Attorney General, told ITV the programme's
broadcasters, that the scene had to go or they may have faced prosecution under
the Official Secrets Act.

Diana Investigation Leaks

LEAKS from the long investigation into the death of Princess Wales offer succour to both pro- and anti- conspiracy theorists, it has emerged.

Conspiracy theorists have often said that the Mercedes that carried Diana to her death last August had been tampered with. But details from a 500 page technical report into the crash car suggest there was nothing wrong with the car and that its speed at impact was 60 mph, not 120 mph as many earlier reports claimed.

But the police technicians do support suspicions about the involvement of a white Fiat Uno which, it says, collided with the Mercedes on entering a Paris road tunnel. Despite massive police efforts the Uno has never been found.

Edit

Mohamed Al Fayed Court Documents Reveal Demands
For CIA Information On Princess Diana's Death

1 September 2000
Source: http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/00-2092.pdf (1.8MB)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[42 pages.]

FILED
AUG 31 2000
[Illegible name of
district court clerk]


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMED AL-FAYED
Harrods Limited
Knightsbridge
London SW1X 7XL
United Kingdom
and
PUNCH LIMITED
100 Brompton Road
London SW3 1ER
United Kingdom

Plaintiffs
v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Washington, D.C. 20505

and
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
9800 Savage Road
Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755

and
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Washington, D.C. 20340-5100

and
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Washington, D.C. 20301

and
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Washington, D.C. 20530

and
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Washington, D.C. 20520

and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION
Washington, D.C. 20535

and
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED
STATES ATTORNEYS
600 E Street, N.W., Room 7100
Washington, D.C. 20530

and
IMMIGRATION AND
NATURALIZATION SERVICE
425 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20536

and
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
950 H. Street, N.W.
Suite 3000
Washington, D.C. 20001

Defendants

* * * * * *



CASE NUMBER 1:00CV02092
JUDGE: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

DECK TYPE: FOIA

DATE STAMP: 08/31/2000

* * * * *




COMPLAINT

This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 702 et seq., for the expedited processing and disclosure of agency records pertaining to the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, and events and individuals associated with the tragedy, that were improperly withheld from plaintiffs Mohammed Al Fayed and Punch Limited by defendants Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the United States Departments of Defense, Justice and State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Executive Office of United States Attorneys, the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the United States Secret Service.

JURISDICTION

1. This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and personal jurisdiction over the defendants pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), 702 and 28 U.S.C. 1331.

VENUE

2. Venue is appropriate under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), 703 and 28 U.S.C. 1391.

PARTIES

3. Plaintiff Mohammed Al Fayed ("Al Fayed") is the owner and publisher of Punch Limited. He is also the father of Dodi Al Fayed, who perished in the August 31, 1997, automobile crash that claimed the life of Princess Diana. Al Fayed maintains a Web site dedicated to resolving the mysteries surrounding the tragedy at http://www.alfayed.com/.

4. Plaintiff Punch Limited ("Punch") is a British political satirical magazine that dates back to 1841. The magazine, which is published 26 times per year, is also available on the Internet at http://www.punch.co.uk/.

5. Defendant Central Intelligence Agency ("CIA") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

6. Defendant National Security Agency ("NSA") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

7. Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency ("DIA") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

8. Defendant Department of Defense ("DoD") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

9. Defendant Department of Justice ("DOJ") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e). It has oversight control and FOIA authority over the Executive Office for United States Attorneys ("EOUSA") and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

10. Defendant Department of State ("DOS") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

11. Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e). It has oversight control and FOIA authority over its field offices in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Mami, New York City and Washington, D.C., as well as its Legal Attaches in London, United Kingdom, Paris, France and Vienna, Austria and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

12. Defendant Immigration & Naturalization Agency ("INS") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

13. Defendant United States Secret Service ("USSS") is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552 (e) and is in possession and/or control of the records requested by Al Fayed and Punch which are the subject of this action.

BACKGROUND

The Tragedy

14. On August 31, 1997, at approximately 12:25 A.M. local time, an automobile carrying Diana Francis Spencer, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Al Fayed crashed into the thirteenth pillar in the tunnel under the Place d'Alma in Paris, France. Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed were killed along with the automobile's driver, Henri Paul, a French security officer at the Ritz Hotel. Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones was the sole survivor.

The French Investigation

15. Shortly after the tragedy, Premier Juge d'instruction Herv Stphan, a French investigating magistrate, instituted an investigation. On or about January 29, 1999, it was announced that the investigation had ended and concluded that the tragedy was caused by drunk driving by Henri Paul, excessive speed and a dangerous stretch of road. Nine photographers and a press motorcyclist were placed under formal investigation -- a step immediately before being formally charged -- for manslaughter and failing to render aid to accident victims. On or about September 3, 1999, Judge Stphan dismissed all charges against the photographers and motorcyclist.

16. The decision to formally end the investigation is presently under appeal by Al Fayed, and judicial proceedings are scheduled for September 2001.

Richard Tomlinson

17. Richard Tomlinson, 37, is a former MI6 (British foreign intelligence service) officer who served from September 1991 through April 1995.

18. On or about August 28, 1998, Tomlinson informed investigating magistrate Herv Stphan that Henri Paul, the chauffeur killed in the tragedy, had been on the MI6 payroll for at least three years. He also revealed that the death crash resembled a MI6 plot to kill Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic in Geneva. A copy of the affidavit Tomlinson provided to Judge Stphan is available at www.alfayed.com/dianaanddodi/tomlinson.html.

19. In or around September 1998, Tomlinson traveled to the United States on board a Swiss Air Flight in order to appear on a NBC television program to discuss his recent revelations. Upon arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Tomlinson was escorted off the plane by United States government officials and detained for several hours. He was never permitted to enter the United States, and instead was placed back on a plane to Europe.

20. Upon information and belief, the United States government prevented Tomlinson from entering the United States at the request of MI6 or other British government officials.

Oswald LeWinter

21. Oswald LeWinter ("LeWinter"), 70, has claimed to be a former United States intelligence operative for more than two decades. He has been linked to several high profile controversies here in the United States and Europe, all of which involved allegations of intelligence connections and specifically the CIA. These controversies have included LeWinter providing what apparently turned out to be disinformation regarding "October Surprise", which involved allegations that individuals associated with Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign delayed the release of American hostages in Iran in order to defeat President Jimmy Carter; claims by LeWinter that the CIA was involved in the 1986 assassination of former Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme; his appearance in a 1994 documentary on the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 entitled The Maltese Double Cross in which LeWinter claimed that the CIA knew that Libya was not responsible for the terrorist attack; and a 1998 attempt, more fully described below, to sell fraudulent CIA documents concerning the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed.

22. In his book October Surprise (1991), Professor Gary Sick describes LeWinter as an "intelligence operative", who was a "graduate of University of California at Berkeley and had a master's degree in English literature from San Francisco State." "He spoke German and English, but he had also acquired a working knowledge of Hebrew, Persian, and French, and some Urdu." Sick stated LeWinter "had served with U.S. forces in Vietnam and also claimed long experience with various U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies."

23. Upon information and belief, LeWinter previously formally maintained a relationship with the CIA, at least to the extent he provided information to the Agency during the 1970s. The CIA presently maintains in its possession records that confirm a relationship, as well as information pertaining to the fraud attempt described below.

The Effort To Defraud Mohamed Al Fayed

24. In late 1997 or early 1998, Keith Fleer ("Fleer"), a prominent California attorney, George Williamson ("Williamson"), an independent journalist, Pat Macmillian ("Macmillian") and LeWinter -- the latter two are both alleged former CIA agents -- participated in an enterprise to sell forged documents purportedly stolen from the CIA that indicated MI6 -- the British foreign intelligence agency -- had plotted to murder Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed. Other individuals who are alleged to have played a role in the scheme include Linda Tumulty, who is tied to the late film producer Alan Francovich, and another former CIA operative named Thompson.

25. LeWinter, Macmillan, and other associates apparently forged the documents and planned to misrepresent them as genuine to induce potential buyers to purchase the documents. Along with Williamson, who was also aware that the documents to be sold were not authentic, LeWinter, Macmillan, and their colleagues agreed that a sale of the forged documents to a tabloid newspaper should be arranged. The participants in the scheme anticipated a sale price of over $1 million.

26. Upon information and belief, at the suggestion of Gaby Leon (phonetic), an individual who allegedly formerly worked for the Argentine Secret Service, Williamson was advised to contact Fleer, an entertainment attorney in Los Angeles, for advice on the sale of the documents and to serve as a broker for their sale.

27. In their course of discussions, Fleer noted that Al Fayed had offered a reward of up to $20 million for information concerning the deaths of his son and Princess Diana and he suggested that they should approach Al Fayed in lieu of a tabloid and offer him the information for $20 million. Fleer stated that he knew one of Al Fayed's attorneys in Washington, D.C. and would make the necessary approaches to him. Upon information and belief, Fleer was to receive 5% of any monies obtained through the sale of the alleged CIA documents.

28. On or about March 24, 1998, Fleer contacted Douglas Marvin ("Marvin"), Al Fayed's legal representative in Washington. Marvin, in turn, put Fleer in contact with John Macnamara ("Macnamara), Al Fayed's chief of security. In a series of telephone conversations over the first two weeks of April 1998, between Fleer and Macnamara, Fleer stated that he had been approached by reliable individuals with credible information that the deaths of Dodi Al Fayed and Princess Diana were not accidental but in fact were the product of a carefully planned assassination carried out at the behest of British intelligence with the knowledge and acquiescence of Buckingham Palace. Fleer indicated that his immediate contact was Williamson, an investigative reporter, and that several "principals" were also involved.

29. According to Fleer, Williamson had connections with CIA sources who had been reliable in the past. Those CIA employees, Fleer stated, would be prepared to disclose their information concerning the deaths of Dodi Al Fayed and the Princess, provided that Al Fayed would provide them with the financial security and assistance to "take measures to protect themselves" -- a price of $20 million. Fleer indicated that, while it was unlikely that the CIA employees would agree to testify in any manner, they could provide authentic and sufficiently detailed CIA documentary evidence to prove the involvement of British intelligence agencies in the assassination plot. Fleer also stated that the CIA sources knew that a CIA operative in Europe had been contacted by someone within the British intelligence agency MI6. The British agent indicated that an assassination team was being compiled and asked for assistance. The CIA employee subsequently cabled for instructions and received in return a telex indicating that the CIA was not to become involved directly but that the agent could give British intelligence the name of a contact with a Mossad-affillated "K team" operating out of Switzerland.

30. In addition to the telexes from and to the CIA operative, Fleer indicated that the CIA sources could and would supply Al Fayed with a relevant intelligence collection report and a medical document indicating that the Princess was pregnant at the time of her deith. Fleer also indicated that there was a report of the results of an internal CIA investigation into the agency's involvement with the assassination of Dodi Al Fayed and Princess Diana, but that this document could only be obtained through a "seven figure" cash payment.

31. On or about April 8, 1998, Fleer requested that Macnamara arrange for the wire transfer of $25,000 "expense money" so that Al Fayed's representatives and the "principals" could meet in a foreign country to arrange for the inspection of the CIA documents and their subsequent sale to Al Fayed.

32. Given that alleged classified information was being offered for sale, on or about April 13, 1998, Al Fayed's representatives contacted and began cooperating with officials from the FBI and the CIA. From here on, all actions taken by Al Fayed's representatives were done so with the approval and supervision of law enforcement and intelligence officials of the Uruited States government.

33. On or about April 13, 1998, Fleer requested that Macnamara send the $25,000 via wire transfer to the account of Garland and Loman, Inc., a New Mexico company with an affiliate in Juarez, Mexico, at the Western Bank, 201 North Church Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001. Fleer explained in a subsequent call to Macnamara that the Western Bank would contact Williamson when the funds were received. The FBI directed Al Fayed's representatives to wire the money from a bank in the District of Columbia so that criminal jurisdiction would lie with the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. Macnamara was told that at the very least the transmittal and receipt of the funds would constitute wire fraud, even if nothing else came of the intended transaction to sell the documents.

34. On or about April 14, 1998, with the approval of U.S. law enforcement authorities, Marvin ordered the wire transfer of $25,000 from a NationsBank branch in Washington, D.C. to the Garland & Loman account. FBI, CIA and EOUSA officials were all aware of the ongoing events.

35. Upon information and belief, Williamson traveled to the Garland and Loman premises in New Mexico to withdraw the $25,000 wire transfer with the intent to use those funds to finance and further the sale of the forged documents to Al Fayed. Williamson subsequently traveled to London, England and disbursed some or all of the $25,000 to his co-conspirators; including, but not limited to, LeWinter.

36. On or about April 14, 1998, following confirmation from Williamson that the $25,000 wire transfer had been received, Fleer informed Macnamara that the meeting to exchange the documents for payment was to take place in Vienna, Austria. Fleer stated that in Austria, Al Fayed's representatives would meet with four "principals," who would offer for sale two CIA telexes and a doctor's certificate that Princess Diana was pregnant at the time of her death. Fleer emphasized that the internal CIA investigative report on the circumstances of the crash would not, however, be provided at the Vienna meeting because "they" had yet to procure it.

37. With the intent to render the proceeds of the sale difficult or impossible to trace, and in an effort to conceal their source, Fleer instructed Macnamara during their conversation on or about April 14, 2000, that he should arrange to have the $15 million negotiated purchase price (having been reduced from $20 million) for the documents deposited at the Austrian bank Kredit Anstalt in a Sparbuch, an anonymous, bearer passbook account. Fleer stated that the passbook was to be handed over to the "principals" at the Vienna meeting as payment for the documents.

38. On or about April 20, 1998, Macnamara received a telephone call in Austria from Williamson, who stated that he was at the Hilton Hotel, New York City. Williamson confirmed that he dealt regularly with the "principals" supplying the documents and that he served as their go-between. He also stated that the "principals" would be present in Vienna and that at least one of them, whose identity remains unknown, had traveled from the United States to meet with Al Fayed's representatives. At an initial meeting, Al Fayed's representatives would be shown at least one of the CIA telexes dealing with the assassination of Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana, and that a serving member of the CIA would be on hand to authenticate the document. Additionally, Williamson also stated that the $25,000 wired by Macnamara had been spent and that "nobody's cheating on you."

39. Following additional negotiations concerning the time, place, and format of the Vienna meeting, Macnamara received two telephone calls from an unknown individual on his mobile phone discussing the mechanics of the document exchange and setting a meeting for April 22, 1998, 2:00 p.m. at the Hotel Ambassador, 1010 Vienna, Neuer Markt 5. Macnamara was to sit on the Krtner Strasse side, where he would be approached by one of the "principals." With the approval of United States and Austrian law enforcement authorities, Macnamara followed the instructions that had been given to him regarding the planned rendezvous.

40. At approximately 2:30 p.m. local time, a man (later identified as LeWinter) approached Macnamara and identified himself as an ex-CIA agent who was in Vienna with six CIA and Mossad agents to deal with "the business." LeWinter spoke to Macnamara for approximately one half hour, briefing him on the provenance of the CIA documents, and indicated that there had been a meeting in London between an MI6 operative named Spelding and a CIA agent named Harrison, who was attached to the United States Embassy in London. At that meeting, Spelding asked Harrison for the CIA's assistance in assassinating Dodi Al Fayed, who had formed a close relationship with Princess Diana. Harrison allegedly cabled CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia for instructions and was informed via telex that the CIA would not become involved but could refer the British to the Mossad "K team" in Geneva. LeWinter indicated to Macnamara that these two telexes were for sale, and he also gave a brief description of the CIA investigative report that could be obtained, including a reference in that report to Princess Diana's pregnancy.

41. At the conclusion of their meeting at the Hotel Ambassador, LeWinter provided a telephone number and requested Macnamara to call him there under the name George Mearah at 5:00 p.m. Law enforcement personnel working with Macnamara traced the telephone number to the Hotel Stadt Bamberg, where they confirmed that the hotel had as a guest an American named Oswald LeWinter who matched Mearah's description.

42. By arrangement, and with the approval of United States and Austrian authorities, Macnamara met with LeWinter later that afternoon at the Ambassador Hotel. Following further discussions with Macnamara, LeWinter was taken into custody at the Ambassador Hotel by Austrian law enforcement officials. On information and belief, two associates (one of which has apparently been identified as Thompson) of LeWinter who were nearby evaded capture. In fact, it turns out that one of the individuals who assisted LeWinter during his time in Vienna was Karl Koecher, a Czechoslovakian intelligence operative who had infiltrated the CIA as a "sleeper" agent during the 1970s. After more than a decade of spying on the United States, Koecher was arrested and ultimately exchanged in a spy trade for Soviet dissident Anatoly Shcharansky on February 11, 1986. Upon information and belief, Koecher and LeWinter became acquainted while serving in prison together in New York State.

43. LeWinter told Macnamara and the arresting officers that six other CIA and Mossad agents were in the Krtner Strasse and would retaliate for his arrest by murdering Macnamara and Al Fayed.

44. Among the papers found in LeWinter's hotel room were an airmail pouch addressed "U.S. Government Property, Return to Commander USA FAC, Indianapolis IN 46249, and a multiple-use U.S. government messenger envelope with the last noted addressee "U.K. liaison." Inside this envelope were two telexes and a Domestic Intelligence Information Report that appeared on their face to originate within the CIA. The documents found in LeWinter's room were subsequently determined to be forgeries. Also found in LeWinter's room was a SM Rohner gas pistol with 25 rounds of ammunition and $10,000 in U.S. currency.

45. On or about October 1, 1998, LeWinter was convicted in an Austrian court of charges of attempted criminal fraud and sentenced to two and a half years imprisonment. On appeal by the Austrian public prosecutor, the Austrian High Court on April 15, 1999, increased LeWinter's sentence to four years imprisonment, citing the "reprehensible way" LeWinter had sought to prey on Al Fayed.

46. Upon information and belief, the Austrian justice ministry sent a request concerning the documents taken from LeWinter's hotel room to the CIA to ascertain their authenticity, and also requested that a United States government expert be sent to testify under oath at LeWinter's trial concerning the documents. The United States government delayed its response for three months, and finally simply replied that the documents were "not authentic" and refused to send any expert to testify under oath.

47. Between April 1998 and the present, Al Fayed's legal representatives in Washington, D.C., including David Kendall and Terrence O'Donnell of the law firm of Williams & Connolly, have repeatedly met and exchanged communications with high level United States government law enforcement and intelligence officials -- including, but not limited to, Deputy Directors from the CIA and FBI, Robert McNamara, the CIA's General Counsel, and Wilma Lewis, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia -- to secure the prosecution of those involved in the fraud attempt.

48. In order to assist the criminal investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Al Fayed's legal representatives provided the prosecuting attorneys with information in their possession including, but not limited to, copies of telephone transcripts between Macnamara and Fleer. It was later subsequently discovered that without permission or knowledge of Al Fayed's representatives, the U S Attorney's Office had provided Fleer, and perhaps the other alleged conspirators, with copies of the evidentiary transcripts for their own personal use. Fleer used this information, in part, to defeat a civil lawsuit filed against him by Al Fayed in California on July 19, 1999; a lawsuit that had been deliberately delayed in order to cooperate with the U.S. Attorney's Office and not interfere with the supposed ongoing criminal investigation.

48.[sic] In recent interviews with LeWinter, including one on April 12, 2000, at Wilhelmshhe Prison, he has suggested that one or more CIA employees participated in the fraud scheme. He has also stated that the forged CIA documents offered to Al Fayed were based, at least in part, upon an e-mail LeWinter received from a "CIA contact in Langley". According to LeWinter, this information was shared with Macmillan, himself allegedly formerly affiliated with the CIA, who then prepared the documents incorporating the information received from the CIA contact.

49. Although LeWinter is willing to name names, he has requested a grant of immunity from the United States government. Despite this fact being provided to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, the FBI and the CIA, upon information and belief, LeWinter has never been questioned by representatives of the United States.

50. Upon information and belief, the CIA's Office of Inspector General was ordered to cease its investigation into the fraud scheme by the CIA's Office of General Counsel. Additionally, the CIA intentionally delayed providing requested information regarding the case to the prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.

51. Although the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia has acknowledged that Al Fayed was the victim of criminal conduct, upon information and belief, the office just recently closed the investigation with a recommendation of "no prosecution."

Previous Unsuccessful Efforts To Obtain Information From The United States

Attempt to Subpoena Relevant Records - District of Columbia

52. On January 29, 1999, in order to confirm or deny allegations contained in news stories that United States intelligence agencies were in the possession of information relevant to the tragedy, Al Fayed's legal representatives filed an Application to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Application requested that the Court issue a subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, which permits U.S. discovery in aid of proceedings before a foreign tribunal, to the DIA and CIA.

53. By Order dated February 5, 1999, the Honorable Henry Kennedy granted Al Fayed's Application and ordered that subpoenas requiring the production of documents be issued to both agencies and that discovery proceed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Since both the CIA and DIA refused to comply with the subpoenas, a motion was filed to compel compliance on March 31, 1999. Eventually, the DIA was released from its obligation but the CIA continued to refuse to produce any information and on May 13, 1999, it moved to quash the subpoena.

54. On March 29, 2000, Judge Kennedy denied Al Fayed's Motion to Compel, granted the CIA's Motion to Quash and vacated his earlier February 6, 1999 Order. This decision is presently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Oral arguments are scheduled for September 6, 2000.

Attempt To Subpoena Relevant Records - Maryland

56. On February 3, 1999, a similar action to that filed in the District of Columbia was attempted in the United States District Court for Maryland requesting the issuance of a subpoena for information held by the NSA. The District Court denied the application on February 4, 1999.

57. The denial was appealed to the United States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, which affirmed the decision on April 26, 2000.

58. No information was ever obtained as the NSA successfully thwarted this effort.

Intervention By Former Senator George Mitchell

59. On behalf of Al Fayed, former Senator George Mitchell, who recently served as a key negotiator in the Northern Island peace process, was retained in 1999, to facilitate the transfer of information held by the CIA and DoD components including, but not limited to, the DIA and NSA.

60. An inquiry for information was submitted by letter dated March 29, 1999, by Senator Mitchell to Secretary of Defense William Cohen. By letter dated April 23, 1999, Secretary Cohen informed Senator Mitchell that neither the DIA or NSA "possesses information that would have any bearing on, or would be at all useful to, the pending French judicial inquiry."

61. Notwithstanding Secretary Cohen's response, Robert Tyrer ("Tyrer"), the chief of staff to Secretary of Defense William Cohen, reviewed potentially responsive classified records which are in the possession of the DIA and NSA. Tyrer refused to publicly share his findings, but informed Senator Mitchell by letter dated October 4, 1999, that there was no information related to Princess Diana's death or that Henri Paul was connected with foreign intelligence services.

62. This latter point directly contradicts what attorney-turned journalist Gerald Posner was told by his American intelligence sources, as reported in the September 1999 issue of Talk magazine. Posner wrote that:

Paul was in regular contact with the Direction Gnral de la Scurit Extrieure (DGSE) -- the French equivalent of the CIA -- an arrangement not unheard of among security staffers at premier international hotels. (Paul also had less formal relations with the Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire and the Renseignements Gnraux, both intelligence gathering divisions of the French national police.) In fact, according to an American law enforcement official and an American intelligence agent, Paul spent the last several hours before the crash with a security officer from the DGSE."[sic] The DGSE is the French intelligence service. This information is additionally supported by former MI6 officer Tomlinson's allegations that Paul was in the paid employ of MI6.

63. Posner also confirmed in his article that the NSA had secretly intercepted and recorded telephone conversations involving Princess Diana. This past Spring, an active intelligence asset of the United States government permitted Posner to listen to one of several surveillance tape recordings of Princess Diana in the possession of NSA.

64. Although Senator Mitchell requested that the DoD ensure all responsive records had been located -- particularly in light of Posner's statements -- upon information and belief, either no such efforts were ever undertaken by the DoD or its components to ensure a complete search had been performed, or information was intentionally withheld. In fact, by letter dated October 13, 1999, Tyrer confirmed that the records he reviewed were retrieved solely through an electronic search of NSA and DIA databases. Upon information and belief, certain record systems are excluded when only electronic searches are conducted.

65. Senator Mitchell also wrote to George Tenet, CIA Director, by letters dated September 2 and 15, 1999, and requested that the CIA initiate a formal inquiry into whether United States intelligence agencies possess information concerning the tragedy. The second letter specifically informed the CIA of Posner's information. The request was denied, although DCI Tenet invited Senator Mitchell to meet with the CIA's General Counsel Robert McNamara.

66. On March 3, 2000, representatives of Al Fayed met with the CIA's Office of General Counsel ("OGC"), and expressed concern that serving officers of the CIA may have played a part in the fraud scheme to sell Al Fayed forged CIA records. A formal inquiry was again requested to investigate these allegations. The OGC subsequently forwarded relevant materials provided by Senator Mitchell to the CIA's Office of Inspector General ("OIG").

67. By letter dated June 16, 2000, Senator Mitchell requested that L. Britt Snider, the CIA's Inspector General, investigate the matter. By letters dated June 16 and 29, 2000, Snider informed Senator Mitchell that the OIG "found no information that would shed light on the automobile accident or the deaths of Lady Diana and Dodi Fayed. Neither did we find any information that would substantiate the claims made by LeWinter concerning the involvement of CIA employees in fabricating these fraudulent documents." Upon information and belief, the OIG was prevented from fully investigating the allegations by the CIA's Office of General Counsel, despite the fact that current or former CIA personnel may have been involved in an illegal scheme to defraud Al Fayed.

Unanswered Questions


68. As with many controversial high-profile events, oftentimes there exists more unanswered questions than those that appear to have been answered. This lawsuit seeks the release of information to answer at least some of those questions including, but not limited to:


Do agencies of the United States government possess any information regarding the deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul?

With all of its forensic and criminal expertise, was the United States government ever requested to lend assistance to the French investigation into the August 31, 1997, tragedy?

Does the United States possess any satellite imagery of the City of Paris from the night of August 31, 1997, that could be used to determine the movement of vehicles in the area of the tragedy?

Does the United States possess information, as alleged by Gerald Posner, that Henri Paul was employed by MI6 as reported by Richard Tomlinson to the judge, or any other foreign intelligence service?

Was Henri Paul meeting his French intelligence handler in the three hours before he returned to the Ritz as claimed by Gerald Posner?

To what extent did the NSA intercept telephonic communications between Princess Diana and others, the existence of which has been confirmed by Gerald Posner?

What documents did Defense Secretary William Cohen's Chief of Staff, Robert Tyrer, review relating to the tragedy, and were the searches conducted to locate these records intentionally narrow?

What is or has been the CIA's relationship with Oswald LeWinter, Pat McMillan and the other individuals involved with the plot to defraud Al Fayed of $20 million dollars?

Although the documents LeWinter alleged were from the CIA are apparently forgeries, does the information within the documents have any accuracy, as claimed by LeWinter?

To what extent did the CIA ever investigate Oswald LeWinter's allegations?

Was the criminal investigation into LeWinter and others for the attempt to defraud Al Fayed over the alleged CIA documents deliberately assigned low priority and then closed by the United States government in an effort to shield the actions of current or former CIA employees from scrutiny or avoid adverse publicity?

COUNT ONE (CIA FOIA REQUEST)

69. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

70. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The CIA was specifically instructed to search its Directorate of Operations, Directorate of Intelligence, Directorate of Administration, Directorate of Central Intelligence and its stations in London, United Kingdom and Paris, France.

71. By letter dated August 10, 2000, the CIA assigned Al Fayed and Punch's request reference F-2000-01568 and denied their request for expedited processing.

72. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch submitted additional information concerning Keith Fleer, Esq. and Oswald LeWinter, and identified Sharon Durkin, Supervisory Special Investigator, Office of Inspector General, as an individual who likely possesses responsive information. See Exhibit "2".

73. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch added John Leslie Macnamara to the list of individuals on whom information was sought. The CIA was specifically instructed to add its station in Vienna, Austria to the locations it must search for responsive records.

74. By facsimile transmitted August 28, 2000, the CIA indicated that it can neither cogfirm nor deny the existence of records relating to individuals listed in items numbered 1 through 6, 8 through 11, 14 through 17 and 21; that it can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records relating to events listed in items numbered 7 through 13 and 20; requested additional information related to the individuals listed in items numbered 8, 10, 12 and 13; and accepted items numbered 2, 18 and 19 for processing.

75. No further relevant correspondence has been received from the CIA.

76. Al Fayed and Punch have exhausted all required administrative remedies with respect to items numbered 2, 18 and 19.

77. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by CIA of said right.

COUNT TWO (NSA FOIA REQUEST)

78. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

79. By letter dated December 15, 1998, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to eleven categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul.

80. By letter dated July 29, 1999, the NSA indicated it had referred responsive records to unnamed agencies. Although responsive records were released by the United States Information Agency and the United States Department of State by letters dated August 13, 1999, and November 4, 1999, respectively, upon information and belief, not all responsive records have been processed or released, for which the NSA lawfully bears responsibility.

81. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver.

82. By letter dated August 11, 2000, the NSA denied the requests for expedited processing and a fee waiver, and indicated it had assigned the requests Serial: J9954-00.

83. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for records pertaining to John Leslie Macnamara, as well as requested a fee waiver and expedited processing. All prior instructions were incorporated into this request.

84. No further response has been received by the NSA.

85. The NSA has faded to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the NSA has wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

86. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies as the NSA has not issued a formal determination regarding the documents.

87. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the NSA of said right.

COUNT THREE (DIA FOIA REQUEST)

88. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

89. By letter dated December 15, 1998, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to eleven categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul.

90. By letter dated March 9, 1999, the DIA indicated it had identified 1,667 responsive records, of which 1,038 were referred to unnamed agencies. Although some responsive records have been released by the United States Information Agency, the Department of the Army's Intelligence and Security Command and the United States Department of State, upon information and belief, not all responsive records have been processed or released, for which the DIA lawfully bears responsibility. Upon information and belief, the DIA had assigned case number 0854-98 to this request.

91. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver.

92. By letter dated July 31, 2000, the DIA acknowledged receipt of the request and assigned it case number 0495-2000.

93. By letter dated August 4, 2000, the DIA indicated it had identified 1,726 responsive records, of which 1,038 were referred to unnamed agencies. One responsive record was withheld in its entirety pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(2).

94. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for records pertaining to John Leslie Macnamara, as well as requested a fee waiver and expedited processing. All prior instructions were incorporated into this request.

95. By letter dated August 18, 2000, an administrative appeal was submitted challenging the DIA's failure to identify the name(s) of the originating agencies to which 1,038 responsive records had been referred, its refusal to release the three DIA records that contain other agencies' information, at least to the extent DIA information is contained therein, and its refusal to disclose the one document withheld in its entirety.

96. No further response has been received by the DIA.

97. The DIA has failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the DIA has wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

98. Al Fayed and Punch have exhausted their administrative remedies with respect to those 1,038 records that have been referred to other agencies.

99. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the DIA of said right.

COUNT FOUR (DOD FOIA REQUEST)

100. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

101. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The DoD was specifically instructed to search its offices on Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (August 3, 2000), Intelligence Oversight (August 3, 2000), J-2 Joint Staff Intelligence Directorate (August 3, 2000) and Public Affairs (August 3, 2000). The dates in parenthesis indicates the date on which a separate FOIA request was submitted directly to each respective DoD office.

102. By letter dated August 4, 2000, the DoD denied the requests for a fee waiver and expedited processing.

103. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for records pertaining to John Leslie Macnamara, as well as requested a fee waiver and expedited processing. All prior instructions were incorporated into this request.

104. No further response has been received by the DoD.

105. The DoD has failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the DoD has wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

106. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies as the DoD has not issued a formal determination regarding the documents.

107. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the DoD of said right.

COUNT FIVE (DOJ FOIA REQUEST)

108. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

109. By letter dated February 26, 1999, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for information relating to Richard Tomlinson.

110. By letter dated July 27, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The DOJ was specifically instructed to search the Office of the Attorney General, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the Office of the Associate General. Separate requests were also submitted to the Criminal Division on July 28, 2000, the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review on July 31, 2000. The request for expedited processing was also served on the Office of Public Affkirs on July 31, 2000.

111. By letter dated August 7, 2000, the DOJ denied the requests for a fee waiver and expedited processing. It also indicated that it would not be able to comply with the twenty-day time limit and exercised its right to an additional ten day period. Al Fayed and Punch were invited to narrow the scope of their request in order to speed up processing.

112. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch narrowed the time frames to be utilized in the DOJ searches, and submitted additional information concerning Keith Fleer, Esq. and Oswald LeWinter, see Exhibit "2".

113. No finther response has been received by the DOJ.

114. The DOJ, with respect to the request dated February 26, 1999, and it's Criminal Division and Office of Intelligence Policy and Review, with respect to the requests dated July 28 and 31, 2000, have failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, these DOJ components have wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

115. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to the Criminal Division and Office of Intelligence Policy and Review, or the DOJ with respect to the February 26, 1999, request, as no formal determination has been issued regarding the requested documents, nor do administrative remedies need to be exhausted with respect to any of the DOJ components regarding the request for expedited processing.

116. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to receive expedited processing.

COUNT SIX (DOS FOIA REQUEST)

117. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

118. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The DOS was specifically instructed to search its Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Bureau of European Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Bureau for Interriational Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, its Country Desks for Austria, France and the United kingdom, its Division of Intelligence Policy and Coordination, its Office of the Legal Adviser, Office of the United Kingdom, Benelux and Ireland Affairs, Office of Western European Affairs and its Embassies in Austria, France and the United Kingdom.

119. By letter dated August 10, 2000, DOS assigned request number 200002685 to Al Fayed and Punch's request, requested additional information and denied the requests for a fee waiver and expedited processing.

120. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch supplied the requested additional information, and identified Julianne Slifco, Legal Attache, and M. Miles Burden, Assistant Legal Attache, both of whom were based out of the United States Embassy in Vienna, Austria, as individuals who are likely in possession of responsive records.

121. No further response has been received from DOS.

122. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to their request for expedited processing.

123. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to receive expedited processing.

COUNT SEVEN (FBI FOIA REQUEST)

124. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

125. By letter dated December 15, 1998, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to six categorie; of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. No responses have ever been received with respect to Requests No. five and six.

126. By letter dated July 26, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The FBI was specifically instructed to search its Criminal Investigative Services, Investigative Services Division, National Security Division and its field offices in Las Vegas (July 31, 2000), Los Angeles (July 31, 2000), New York City (July 31, 2000) and Washington, D.C. (July 31, 2000), as well as its Legal Attaches in London, United Kingdom (July 26, 2000) and Paris, France (July 26, 2000). The dates in parenthesis indicates the date on which a separate FOIA request was submitted directly to the FBI's field office or Legal Attache.

127. By facsimile dated July 28, 2000, the FBI acknowledged receipt of Al Fayed and Punch's FOIA request.

128. By letter dated August 4, 2000, the FBI indicated it had assigned Request No. 0927093-000 to its search for records relating to Princess Diana et al.

129. By letter dated August 7, 2000, the FBI's New York City field office declined to process those requests relating to third parties for whom no privacy waiver had been submitted.

130. By letter dated August 7, 2000, the FBI indicated it did not possess any responsive information regarding Henri Paul, for which it had assigned Request No. 0927097-000. It additionally acknowledged that it had only searched for responsive records in the automated indices that are indexed as main files.

131. By letter dated August 7, 2000, the FBI indicated it did not possess any responsive information regarding Emad Dodi Fayed, for which it had assigned Request No. 0927096-000. It additionally acknowledged that it had only searched for responsive records in the automated indices that are indexed as main files.

132. By letters dated August 7, 2000, the FBI declined to process those requests relating to third parties for whom no privacy waiver had been submitted. These requests had been assigned Request Nos. 0927099-000, 0927100-000, 0927102-000 through 0927105-000, 0927107-000, 0927108-000, 0927111-000 and 0927113-000.

133. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI's Legal Attaches in Vienna, Austria for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver.

134. By letter dated August 14, 2000, the FBI's Washington Field Office indicated it had failed to locate any responsive records pertaining to Princess Diana, Emad "Dodi" Fayed or Henri Paul, that it possessed records relating to Mohamed Al Fayed but was withholding them pursuant to (j)(2) of the Privacy Act and FOIA Exemption (7)(A), that it had located records responsive to Richard Tomlinson but that FBI Headquarters had assumed processing responsibility and that with respect to any third party requests a privacy waiver would have to be submitted first before processing could begin.

135. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch identified the following FBI employees as individuals who likely possess responsive information: Robert M. Bryant, Deputy Director, Special Agent Paul Timko, Washington Field Office, Special Agent James R. Sobchack, Washington Field Office, Special Agent Armin Showalter, Washington Field Office, Julianne Slifco, Legal Attache, United States Embassy, Vienna, Austria and M. Miles Burden, Assistant Legal Attache, United States Embassy, Vienna, Austria.

136. By letter dated August 15, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch notified the FBI that it had impermissibly narrowed the appropriate search parameters with respect to 0927096-000 (Fayed, Emad Dodl) and 0927097-000 (Paul, Henri). The FBI was specifically instructed to search for any "see references", numbered and lettered subfiles, 1A envelopes, ticklers, enclosures behind files (EBFs), Bulky Exhibits, control files, "JUNE" files, abstracts, search slips including search slips used to process this request, file covers and tapes of electronic surveillance, any "DO NOT FILE" files, SAC safes, special files rooms and the offices and workplaces of any FBI officials who were previously identified in the earlier letter dated August 14, 2000, as well as any other officials who may potentially maintain responsive records. Finally, all relevant FBI components including, but not limited to, the General Investigative Division, Internal Security, and Congressional Liaison Unit were tasked to be searched for any responsive records. The FBI was requested to re-open the two closed requests, and that if it declined it should consider this a new request. Additionally, the FBI was requested to reconsider its decision not to search for records concerning third parties without the submission of a privacy waiver.

137. Not withstanding Al Fayed and Punch's August 15, 2000, request to the FBI for reconsideration, an administrative appeal was filed dated August 15, 2000, challenging the FBI's refusal to process third party requests without submission of a privacy waiver.

138. By letter dated August 15, 2000, the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office declined to process those requests relating to third parties for whom no privacy waiver had been submitted.

139. By letter dated August 16, 2000, the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office indicated that no responsive records were found concerning Princess Diana, Emad Dodi Fayed, Henri Paul or Mohamed Al Fayed. It additionally acknowledged that it had only searched for responsive records in the automated indices that are indexed as main files.

140. By letter dated August 16, 2000, the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office indicated that it possessed records pertaining to Richard Tomlinson, but was withholding them pursuant to (j)(2) of the Privacy Act and FOIA Exemption (7)(A).

141. By letter dated August 16, 2000, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI's field office in North Miami Beach, Florida, for records pertaining to himself. Multiple variations of his name were provided to facilitate a search for responsive records.

142. By letter dated August 16, 2000, the FBI indicated it had assigned Request No. 0927682-000 to its search for records relating to Mohamed Al Fayed et al.

143. By letter dated August 16, 2000, Al Fayed, through counsel, submitted additional information regarding multiple variations of the spelling of his name and relevant FBI file numbers to facilitate a search for responsive records. The FBI was specifically instructed to provide copies of this letter to all of its field offices and Legal Attaches to which requests had been previously submitted.

144. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, appealed the FBI's Washington Field Office's responses in its letter dated August 14, 2000, and challenged the denial of access to responsive records, the refusal to process responsive records by referring them to FBI Headquarters and the refusal to process third party requests without submission of a privacy waiver.

145. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for records pertaining to John Leslie Macnamara, as well as requested a fee waiver and expedited processing. The FBI was specifically instructed to provide copies of this letter to all of its field offices and Legal Attaches to which requests had been previously submitted.

146. By letter dated August 17, 2000, the FBI's Office of Legal Attache in the United States Embassy in London, United Kingdom, indicated that it "does not maintain closed investigative or administrative files" and referred the FOIA request to FBI Headquarters.

147. By facsimile dated August 18, 2000, the FBI acknowledged receipt of Al Fayed and Punch's 1701A request dated August 17, 2000.

148. By letter dated August 18, 2000, the FBI requested additional information regarding Al Fayed.

149. By letter dated August 22, 2000, the FBI was reminded that the requested information concerning Al Fayed had already been submitted, that it had already processed a request under the same name and located responsive records, but that the information was being provided again.

150. By letter dated August 22, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch notified the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office that it had impermissibly narrowed the appropriate search parameters. The field office was specifically instructed to search for any "see references", informant reports, summaries of informant activity, results of interviews with subjects of investigation, memos concerning whether or not to proceed with an investigation, agent's memos on phone calls made or received, letters requesting information from phone company, credit bureaus, etc., requests from one field office to another, agent's memos on following leads, interviews or record checking, interview logs, requests for mail covers,, correlation summaries for field offices, numbered and lettered subfiles, 1A envelopes, ticklers, enclosures behind files (EBFs), Bulky Exhibits, memos about receipt and destruction of bulky exhibits, control files, "JUNE" files, abstracts, search slips including search slips used to process this request, file covers and tapes of electronic surveillance, any "DO NOT FILE" files, SAC safes, special files rooms and the offices and workplaces of any FBI officials who may possibly possess responsive records. The field office was requested to re-open the closed requests, but that if it declined it should consider this a new request. Additionally, the FBI was requested to reconsider its decision not to search for records concerning third parties without the submission of a privacy waiver.

151. Not withstanding Al Fayed and Punch's August 22, 2000, request to the FBIs Los Angeles Field Office for reconsideration, an administrative appeal was filed by letter dated August 22, 2000, regarding the responses in the letters dated August 15, 2000, and August 16, 2000, and challenging the denial of access to responsive records, the impermissible narrowing of its search parameters, and the refusal to process third party requests without submission of a privacy waiver.

152. Al Fayed has exhausted the required administrative remedies with respect to items five and six of his request dated December 15, 1998. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to their requests for expedited processing. Nor do administrative remedies need to be exhausted with respect to the FBI's field office in Las Vegas or the Legal Attaches in London, United Kingdom and Paris, France, as these offices have not issued a formal determination regarding the requested documents,

153. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by FBI of said right.

COUNT EIGHT (EOUSA FOIA REQUEST)

154. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

155. By letter dated July 27, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. The EOUSA was specifically instructed to search its files within the District of Columbia, Southern District of New York, Central District of California and Eastern District of New York.

156. By letters dated August 8, 2000, the EOUSA indicated it had assigned these requests by categories of "deceased third parties" (00-2565 through 00-2568), "French Inquiry" (00-2569 through 00-2572), "Mohamed Al Fayed" (00-2573 through 00-2576) and "living third parties" (00-2577 through 00-2580). Each category was assigned a number correlating with the District of Columbia, Southern District of New York, Central District of California and Eastern District of New York, respectively.

157. By letter dated August 8, 2000, the EOUSA denied Al Fayed and Punch's request for a fee waiver.

158. By letter dated August 14, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch submitted additional information concerning Keith Fleer, Esq. and Oswald LeWinter, see Exhibit "2", and identified Lisa Prager, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Transnational/Major Crimes Section, District of Columbia, William Blier, Chief, Transnational/Major Crimes Section, District of Columbia, Wilma E. Lewis, United States Attorney, District of Columbia and Rhonda Field, Chief of Staff, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Columbia, as individuals who likely possesses responsive information.

159. By letter dated August 17, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request for records pertaining to John Leslie Macnamara, as well as requested a fee waiver and expedited processing. All prior instructions were incorporated into this request.

160. No further response has been received by the EOUSA.

161. The EOUSA has failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the EOUSA has wrongfully withheld records from Al Fayed and Punch.

162. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies as the EOUSA has not issued a formal determination regarding the records.

163. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the EOUSA of said right.

COUNT NINE (INS FOIA REQUEST)

164. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

165. By letters dated July 27, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a FOIA request to the INS's headquarters in Washington, D.C. and office in New York City for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a fee waiver.

166. By letter dated August 3, 2000, the INS's New York office indicated that it had searched for records that relate to the request, had determined that if any records existed they would be maintained under the jurisdiction of INS headquarters and referred the request to headquarters. The INS New York City office assigned Al Fayed and Punch's request number NYC2000007354. Upon information and beliet no search for responsive reGords was ever conducted.

167. No further response has been received by the INS.

168. The INS has failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the INS has wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

169. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies as the INS has not issued a formal determination regarding the documents.

170. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the INS of said right.

COUNT TEN (USSS FOIA REQUEST)

171. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

172. By letter dated July 31, 2000, Al Fayed and Punch, through counsel, submitted a
FOIA request for disclosure of all information pertaining to twenty categories of names
and events related to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and
Henri Paul. See Exhibit "1". The request additionally sought expedited processing and a
fee waiver.

173. By letters dated August 25, 2000, the USSS assigned the FOIA requests file numbers 2000515 through 2000521 and 2000525.

174. No other relevant response has been received by the USSS.

175. The USSS has failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under the FOIA. Therefore, the USSS has wrongfully withheld documents from Al Fayed and Punch.

176. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies as the US SS has not issued a formal determination regarding the documents.

177. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the FOIA to be granted expedited processing, a fee waiver, and to obtain the information they seek, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the USSS of said right.

COUNT ELEVEN (APA - EXPEDITED PROCESSING)

178. Al Fayed and Punch repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 above, inclusive.

179. Requests for expedited processing of all responsive records were submitted to each of the defendant agencies as permitted by statute and internal agency regulation.

180. The CIA, NSA, DoD, DOJ and DOS each denied the request. The DIA, FBI, EOUSA, INS and USSS have failed to timely respond.

181. Al Fayed and Punch have met the requisite requirements as set forth in the respective agency regulations to be entitled to expedited processing of their FOIA requests.

182. By denying Al Fayed and Punch's request for expedited processing, the CIA, NSA, DoD, DOJ and DOS have each violated their respective internal regulations.

183. The DIA, FBI, EOUSA, INS and USSS have failed to comply with the requisite statutory periods that govern compliance under their respective agency regulations. Therefore, these defendants have violated the requirements of their internal regulations.

184. Al Fayed and Punch are not required to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to a denial of a request for expedited processing, nor under circumstances where an agency has failed to issue a formal determination regarding the request.

185. Al Fayed and Punch have a legal right under the respective regulations of the agency defendants to be granted expedited processing, and there is no legal basis for the denial by the CIA, NSA, DIA, DoD, DOJ, DOS, FBI, EOUSA, INS and USSS of said right.

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Mohammed al Fayed and Punch Limited pray that this Court:

(1) orders the CIA, NSA, DIA, DoD, DOJ, DOS, FBI, EOUSA, INS and USSS to disclose the requested records in their entireties and make copies promptly available to them;

(2) grant expedited processing, or otherwise expedite this action in every way pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1657 (a);

(3) award plaintiffs reasonable costs and attorney's fees as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(4)(E) and/or 28 U.S.C. 2412 (d); and

(4) grant such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

Date: August 31, 2000

[Signature]
Mark S. Zaid, Esq.
D.C. Bar #440532
Lobel, Novins & Lamont
1275 K Street, N.W.
Suite 770
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 371-6626

Counsel for Plaintiffs



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Exhibit 1]

26 July 2000

REQUESTS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
BY MOHAMED AL FAYED AND PUNCH MAGAZINE

Request No. 1

All records relating to Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales (DOB: July 1, 1961; British citizen), Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed)(DOB: 1955; Egyptian citizen) and/or Henri Paul (DOB: July 3, 1956; French citizen) all of whom were killed in Paris, France on August 31, 1997. The deaths of these three individuals cannot be in dispute.
Request No. 2:

All records relating to the August 31, 1997, deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed), Henri Paul and/or Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales, that occurred in Paris, France.
Request No. 3:

All records relating to the inquiry conducted by investigating French Judge (Premier Juge d'instruction) Herv Stphan regarding the August 31, 1997, deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed), Henri Paul and/or Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales, that occurred in Paris, France.
Request No. 4:

All records relating to surveillance and/or intelligence gathering activities directed at or originating from Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed), Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales and/or Henri Paul.
Request No. 5:

All records relating to Mohamed Al Fayed, a resident of London, England and the father of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed). An Authorization and Privacy Waiver is enclosed as Exhibit "1A". The original is maintained in my possession.
Request No. 6:

All records relating to Trevor Rees-Jones (DOB: 1968; British citized including, but not limited to, his book "The Bodyguard's Story", and the book's ghost writer Moira Johnston.
Request No. 7:

All records relating to an effort in 1997-98 to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 8:

All records relating to Keith Fleer, an entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles, California, and the effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 9:

All records relating to Karl F. Koecher, a former Czech spy who was arrested, charged, and subsequently exchanged in 1985, by the United States for Soviet dissident Anatoly Shcharansky, and the effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 10:

All records relating to Oswald LeWinter (aka George Mearah) (DOB: approximately 1930; United States citizen) including, but not limited to, his effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales. For your information, Mr. LeWinter has been tied to events involving the October Surprise and Iran-Contra scandals and the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103.
Request No. 11:

All records relating to Ricardo Shapp, and the effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 12:

All records relating to George Williamson, a U.S. reporter, and the effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 13:

All records relating to Pat McMillan (aka MacMillan), allegedly a former CIA agent, and the effort to sell classified or unclassified records, allegedly created by or from the possession of the CIA, pertaining to the deaths of Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales.
Request No. 14:

All records relating to Jacques Pettier, an individual believed to reside at 8 Rue du Congres, Asniere-Paris, France.
Request No. 15:

All records relating to Richard John Charles Tomlinson, who was employed by the British intelligence agency MI6 between September 1991 and April 1995. An Authorization and Privacy Waiver is enclosed as Exhibit "1B". The original is maintained in my possession.
Request No. 16:

All records relating to the detention by U.S. govemment officials of Richard John Charles Tomlinson, who was employed by the British intelligence agency MI6 between September 1991 and April 1995, at John F. Kennedy International Airport after arriving on a Swiss Air flight on or about August 30, 1998. An Authorization and Privacy Waiver is enclosed. The original is maintained in my possession.
Request No. 17:

All records relating to David Shayler, but only to the extent the records pertain to Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales, Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and/or Henri Paul, all of whom were killed in Paris, France on August 31, 1997.
Request No. 18:

All records pertaining to requests received by intermediaries acting on behalf of Mohamed al-Fayed including, but not limited to, former Senator George Mitchell. This request pertains, but is not limited to, Senator Mitchell's letters to the CIA dated September 2 and 15, 1999, and DCI George Tenet's response dated September 30, 1999; Senator Mitchell's letter to Robert S. Tyrer, Chief of Staff, Office of the Secretary of Defense, dated September 17, 1999, and Mr. Tyrer's response dated October 4, 1999; and Secretary of Defense William Cohen's letter to Senator Mitchell dated April 28, 1999.
Request No. 19:

All records pertaining to Mohamed al-Fayed's efforts to obtain records or information relating to the death of his son Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed) and Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales. In responding to this request, you may exclude those records that were publicly filed as part of the legal proceedings in In re Application of Mohamed Al Fayed, Misc. No. 99-43 (D.D.C.); In re Application of Mohamed Al Fayed, Misc. No. 99-35 (D.Md.); In re Application of Mohamed Al Fayed, Appeal No. 99-1268 (4th Cir.); Mohamed Al Fayed v. Keith Fleer et al., Case No. BC 213751 (Sup. Ct. Los Angeles, Calif); Mohamed Al Fayed v. Keith Fleer et al., Case No. B137378 (Ct. App. 2nd Div. Calif ), except to the extent internal notations or comments have been added.
Request No. 20:

All records pertaining to the review of information provided by the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, pertaining to Emad "Dodi" Fayed (aka Imad Mohamed Fayed), Henri Paul and/or Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales, including that which was deemed responsive to Mohamed Al-Fayed's FOIA requests, by any government officials including, but not limited to, Robert S. Tyrer, Chief of Staff, Office of the Secretary of Defense.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Exhibit 2]

KEITH G. FLEER
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Suite 1800, 1000 Wilshlre Boulevard
Los Angeles, Califorriia. 90017-2475
(Los Angeles County)
Telephone: 213-688-3400
Facsimile: 213-688-3460
Email: kfleer@loeb.com
Web-Site: http://www.loeb.com/

Firm Listing

POSITION: Member

ADMITTED: 1967, District of Columbia; 1968, New York, 1976, California

LAW-SCHOOL: Washington College of Law of American University (J.D., 1967)

COLLEGE: American University (B.A., 1964)

TEXT: Omicron Delta Kappa (President) Business Editor, American University Law
Review. Member, National Moot Court Team. Recipient, Bruce Hughes Award and
Alumni Award, Outstanding Leadership and Scholarship. Co-Chair, 1991-1992 and
Member, 1983- , UCLA Entertainment Symposium Advisory Committee. Adjunct
Professor, University of Southern California Law Center, 1996. (Century City Office)

MEMBER: American Bar Association; Los Angeles Copyright Society (President, 1989); American Film Marketing Association (Member, Seminar Planning Committee).

BORN: February 28, 1943, New York, N.Y.

______________________________________



OSWALD LE WINTER

Known aliases:

George Mearah
Abrahim Razin
John Fishmah
Oscar Winter
Razin Le Winter
I. Semit
Thought to have born George Mearah

Date of Birih: 4 February 1931
Place of Birth: La Quenta, California

Last known US. address: 31900 Manherim Lane, La Quinto, California 92253

Additional information that may help facilitate searches:


In November 1997, he represented himself as a former CIA employee describing himself to the CIA as a Counter-Intelligence Director;
In 1995, he allegedly stood trial in Germany on weapons transfer changes anid was found guilty;
In 1991, he allegedly passed information to the BBC of CIA involvement in the death of the late Prime Minister Aldo Moro of Italy;
In 1990, he allegedly attended the World Jewish Conference in East Berlin, East Germany, and produced a card describing himself as a former CIA agent;
In 1989, he was allegedly convicted in Frankfurt, Germany of impersonation of a former CIA officer;
In 1984, he was allegedly arrested by the German police for drug trafficking.
In 1983, he allegedly represented himself as a Professor of Psychology at the University of Maryland;
In 1971, he allegredly obtained false credit by producing a forged New York Police Department badge;
He had himself listed in Who's Who in East Germany as a CIA agent.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcription and HTML by Cryptome.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[This is the court docket for an earlier proceeding.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt

09/01/2000 12:33:23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Docket as of April 19, 2000 8:25 pm Page 1

Proceedings include all events.
1:99ms43 In re: AL FAYED
APPEAL
APPEAL
U.S. District Court
USDC District of Columbia (Washington)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-MS-43

In re: AL FAYED Filed: 01/29/99
Assigned to: Judge Henry H. Kennedy
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 0
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: unknown
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: Motion for Production of Documents & Continued Deposition
Case type: 1. miscellaneous


MOHAMED AL FAYED
In re:


-------------------------


CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Andrea M. Sharrin
Non Party FTS 616-8268
Room 943
[COR LD NTC gvt]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Division
901 E Street, NW
P.O. Box 883
Washington, DC 20530
AREA CODE (202)


DEPARTMENT OF INTELLIGENCE Andrea M. Sharrin
AGENCY (See above)
Non Party [COR LD NTC gvt]


-------------------------


MOHAMED AL FAYED Terrence O'Donnell
movant FTS 434-5000
202-434-5029 FAX
[COR LD NTC ret]
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY
Edward Bennett Williams
Building
725 12th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
AREA CODE (202)


Docket as of April 19, 2000 8:25 pm Page 2

Proceedings include all events.
1:99ms43 In re: AL FAYED
APPEAL



Docket as of April 19, 2000 8:25 pm Page 3

Proceedings include all events.
1:99ms43 In re: AL FAYED
APPEAL
1/29/99 1 APPLICATION (EXPARTE) by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED for
order directing issuance of subpoenas pursuant to 28 USC
1782; exhibits (3) (bcs) [Entry date 02/02/99]

2/5/99 2 ORDER by Judge Henry H. Kennedy : granting motion for
order directing issuance of subpoenas pursuant to 28 USC
1782 [1-1] by MOHAMED AL FAYED (N) (dcn)

3/31/99 3 MOTION filed by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED to compel agencies
to comply with subpoenas issued to DOD and CIA ; exhibits
(4) (tb) [Entry date 04/01/99]

4/19/99 4 MOTION filed by Non Party CIA, Non Party DEPT/INTELLIGENCE
to extend time to 4/29/99 to respond to plaintiff's motion
to compel and order (adc) [Entry date 04/20/99]

5/13/99 5 MOTION filed by Non Party CIA to quash the subpoena;
exhibits (16) (tb) [Entry date 05/14/99]

5/26/99 6 REPLY by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED in support of motion to
compel agencies to comply with subpoenas issued to DOD and
CIA [3-1] by MOHAMED AL FAYED; exhibits (2) (tb)
[Entry date 05/27/99]

5/26/99 7 RESPONSE by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED in opposition to
motion to quash the subpoena [5-1] by CIA . (tb)
[Entry date 05/27/99]

6/8/99 8 NOTICE OF FILING RE: declaration of Georges Kiejman by
movant MOHAMED AL FAYED; attachment (tb)
[Entry date 06/09/99]

6/18/99 9 REPLY by Non Party CIA in support of to motion to quash the
subpoena [5-1] (jf) [Entry date 06/21/99]

9/2/99 10 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED in
support of motion to compel agencies to comply with
subpoenas issued to DOD and CIA [3-1] by MOHAMED AL FAYED;
Exhibit. (lkn) [Entry date 09/08/99]

9/22/99 11 MOTION filed by Non Party CIA to strike supplemental
memorandum [10-1], or for leave to file response and
notice of recent events (tb)

10/6/99 12 MEMORANDUM by In re: MOHAMED AL FAYED in opposition to
motion to strike supplemental memorandum [10-1] [11-1] by
CIA; exhibits (2) (tb) [Entry date 10/07/99]

2/24/00 13 MOTION filed by In re: MOHAMED AL FAYED for status
conference hearing ; exhibit (1) (bjsp)
[Entry date 02/25/00]



Docket as of April 19, 2000 8:25 pm Page 4

Proceedings include all events.
1:99ms43 In re: AL FAYED
APPEAL
3/29/00 14 ORDER by Judge Henry H. Kennedy : granting motion to
quash the subpoena [5-1] by CIA, denying motion to compel
agencies to comply with subpoenas issued to DOD and CIA
[3-1] by MOHAMED AL FAYED, vacating this Court's 2/5/99
order directing issuance of a subpoena to the CIA [2-1] (N)
(adc) [Entry date 03/30/00]

4/10/00 15 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION by Judge Henry H. Kennedy : (N)
(N) (dcn)

4/10/00 16 JUDGMENT by Judge Henry H. Kennedy; dismissing 99ms43 (dcn)

4/12/00 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL by movant MOHAMED AL FAYED from order
[14-1], entered on: 3/30/00 and judgment order [16-1],
entered on: 4/10/00. $5.00 filing fee paid and $100.00
docketing fee paid. Copies mailed to all parties. (tth)
[Entry date 04/13/00]

4/13/00 -- TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [17-1] by MOHAMED
AL FAYED to U.S. Court of Appeals (tth)

4/13/00 18 LETTER filed by Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b). (tth)
[Entry date 04/18/00]

4/18/00 -- USCA # 00-5150 assigned for appeal [17-1] by MOHAMED AL
FAYED (tth) [Entry date 04/19/00]

[END OF DOCKET: 1:99ms43]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Court of Appeals docket.]

______________________________________________________

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt

09/01/2000 18:21:32
______________________________________________________


General Docket
US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Docket #: 00-5150 Filed: 4/17/00
Nsuit: 2890 Other Statutory Actions
In Re: Al Fayed v.
Appeal from: U.S. District Court

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lower court information:

District: 0090-1 : 99ms00043 lead: 99ms00043
Trial Judge: Henry H. Kennedy, US District Judge
Date Filed: 1/29/99
Date order/judgment: 3/29/00
Date NOA filed: 4/12/00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fee status: paid

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prior cases:
None
Current cases:
None

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am Page 1




00-5150 In Re: Al Fayed v.

MOHAMED AL FAYED David E. Kendall
Appellant FAX 202-434-5792
202-434-5145
[COR LD NTC ret]
Paul C. Rauser
[COR ret]
Williams & Connolly
725 12th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
202-434-5000

v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Wilma Antoinette Lewis, U.S.
Appellee Attorney
202-514-6600
[COR gvt]
U.S. Attorney's Office
(USA) Civil Appellate
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-514-7159

David William Ogden, Acting
Assistant Attorney General
202-514-3301
Room 9530
[COR gvt]
Mark B. Stern, Attorney
202-514-5089
Room 9135
[COR gvt]
H. Thomas Byron, III, Attorney
202-616-5367
Room 9106
[COR LD NTC gvt]
U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) Civil Division, Appellate
Staff
601 D Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

DEPARTMENT OF INTELLIGENCE Wilma Antoinette Lewis, U.S.
AGENCY Attorney
Appellee (See above)
[COR gvt]

David William Ogden, Acting
Assistant Attorney General
(See above)
[COR gvt]
Mark B. Stern, Attorney
(See above)

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am Page 2




00-5150 In Re: Al Fayed v.

[COR gvt]
H. Thomas Byron, III, Attorney
(See above)
[COR LD NTC gvt]

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am Page 3




00-5150 In Re: Al Fayed v.

Mohamed Al Fayed

Appellant

v.

Central Intelligence Agency; Department of Intelligence
Agency

Appellees

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am Page 4




00-5150 In Re: Al Fayed v.

4/17/00 CIVIL-US CASE docketed. Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant
Mohamed Al Fayed. [515211-1] (sha)

4/18/00 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorneys Paul C. Rauser
(application to be submitted), David E. Kendall for
Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed (Styled as "Representation
Statement" and received by the Court on 4/14/00 before case
opening). [511176-1]. (sha)

4/19/00 CLERK'S ORDER filed directing Appellant to file [511418-1]:
docketing statement; certificate of counsel; statement of
issues; lower court decision; any procedural motions;
deferred appendix notice due 5/19/00; any dispositive
motions due 6/5/00. Directing Appellee to file [511418-2]:
certificate of counsel; any procedural motions; appearance
form due 5/19/00; any dispositive motions due 6/5/00.
[Entry Date: 4/19/00] (sha)

4/20/00 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney H. Thomas Byron for
Appellees' Dept Intelligence, and CIA [511980-1]. (jth)

4/20/00 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Mark B. Stern for
Appellees' Dept Intelligence, and CIA [511981-1]. (jth)

5/19/00 INITIAL SUBMISSIONS filed by Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed
[518422-1] : docketing statement; certificate of counsel;
statement of issues; lower court decision; deferred
appendix notice (Deferred Appendix needed = Y). (wmw)

5/19/00 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Paul C. Rauser for
Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed, David E. Kendall for Appellant
Mohamed Al Fayed [518432-1] . (wmw)

5/19/00 STIPULATION filed (5 copies) Regular Stand-By Pool
[518437-1], establishing the initial briefing schedule
[518437-2] : Appellant's brief due on 6/9/00; Appellant's
appendix due on 6/9/00; Appellee's brief due on 6/30/00;
Appellant's reply brief due on 7/10/00. (wmw)

5/23/00 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney David E. Kendall for
Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed [518958-1] . (sha)

6/1/00 CLERK'S ORDER filed to schedule oral argument [520609-1]
before Judge Initials: SFW DBS JWR on 9/6/00 at 9:30 AM .
[Entry Date: 6/1/00] (cwc)

6/9/00 BRIEF filed by Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed [522561-1].
Copies: 15. Certificate of service date 6/9/00. (jth)

6/9/00 APPENDIX filed by Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed [522564-1].
Copies: 10. Certificate of service date 6/9/00. (jth)

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am Page 5




00-5150 In Re: Al Fayed v.

6/30/00 BRIEF filed by Appellee's CIA, Department of Intelligence
[527498-1]. Copies: 15. (Certificate of personal service
dated 6/30/00). (jth)

7/10/00 REPLY BRIEF filed by Appellant Mohamed Al Fayed [528376-1].
Copies: 15. (Certificate of personal service date 7/10/00).
(jth)

8/25/00 PER CURIAM ORDER filed to allocate oral argument times:
APET minutes- 10 ERES minutes- 10. [539182-1], One
counsel per side to argue. [539182-2] Oral argument
scheduled for 9/6/00, Form 72 notice of attorney arguing
case - [539182-3] due 9/1/00 for CIA, for Mohamed Al Fayed
. . Before Judges Williams, Sentelle, Rogers . [Entry
Date: 8/25/00] (lej)

Docket as of August 26, 2000 0:36 am
Edit

Open Letter From Mohamed Al Fayed

MI6 Murdered the People's Princess
Open Letter from Mohammed Al Fayed
Mohammed Al Fayed, www.Mathaba.net

Most people are profoundly shocked, and rightly so, by the idea that Dodi and Diana were murdered. Yet it is my firm belief that Britain's racist establishment found their relationship utterly unacceptable, and so conspired with the intelligence services to have them killed. My repeated appeals for a full public inquiry in Britain into the Paris tragedy have been rejected out of hand by the prime minister, Tony Blair and the home secretary, Jack Straw but I shall never abandon my fight for disclosure of the full facts. The following open letter explains why.

Since the 31st August 1997, the terrible day that my son Dodi and Princess Diana died in Paris, I have tried by all means that I know to get answers to the many questions left hanging in the air. I have been thwarted at every turn. The official French investigation has so far failed to resolve many key questions. The British government still refuses to hold a public inquiry. The intelligence services in France, Britain and the USA have stonewalled though we know that intelligence services had Diana under surveillance on the fateful night in Paris. And, as we have seen only too clearly following the publication of the book by Trevor Rees-Jones (but one example), there has been a concerted campaign to discredit my attempts to get at the truth.

I know that I am bitterly resented by some members of the British establishment. There are those who cannot accept that an Egyptian from a modest background should have become the owner of Harrods, a shop they considered a part of their heritage. Others reckon me beyond the pale because of my part in revealing corruption in the highest places. For a few, I suspect, it is simply a matter of racism; though they would never dream of saying so in public, they despise foreigners especially those with crinkly hair and dark skins. Behind the scenes, the extreme right-wing in Britain still wields enormous influence particularly in the press and the corridors of unelected power. In my experience these people are ruthless in their determination and will stop at nothing to achieve their ends.

Certainly my attempts to make progress through the official channels are blocked consistently by a brick wall of silence and secrecy.

When I met Mr Blair in May 1999 at a reception hosted by the Muslim Council, I gave him this paper which set out my concerns and asked for his help, and a copy of this memo which I had given to the Council. I heard nothing. Then my lawyers wrote to him. Again, nothing. The same wall of silence greeted my letters to the Foreign Secretary, the Home Secretary and the Heads of MI5 and MI6. Such silence is rude and discourteous to me personally. I have given 35 years of my life to this country, paying hundreds of millions in taxes and employing tens of thousands of people. I have helped to win British firms overseas contracts worth billions of pounds. After making such a contribution to the country, I think I've earned the right to some answers. But more importantly, the people of Britain deserve answers: Diana was in Tony Blair's words "The People's Princess". A blanket refusal to answer legitimate questions can only fuel suspicion of foul play.

These concerns were taken up in Parliament by the Conservative MP Charles Wardle. He did so of his own volition. In an adjournment debate in July 1999 he set out with great force and clarity the many reasons for holding a full inquiry in Britain into the Paris crash, conducted openly for all to see and follow. He requested a formal response from the Home Office; none has been forthcoming.

I have pursued information in the United States under their Freedom of Information Act. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have confirmed that they hold 39 documents consisting of 1,056 pages of information relating to Diana and Dodi but they refuse to reveal it on the grounds of national security. My American lawyers have been fighting for access to this vital information for the last year. A court in Washington DC has ordered the CIA to hand over the documents, but they have not complied. Recently we sought a subpoena to force the production of the documents only to have the judge rule that, under the statute which allows subpoenas to be issued in connection with foreign proceedings, he did not have jurisdiction to issue a subpoena against the federal government. We have appealed and hope to get some movement soon, but it is a very slow business.

The attitude of the British government was well-illustrated recently. On 27 February The Sunday Times published an article headlined "Spy agencies listened in on Diana". In this article, "former intelligence officials" confirmed to the newspaper that spy agencies in Britain and America "eavesdropped on Diana". The very next day, in response to my earlier demands for an official statement on this matter, I received a letter from the Treasury Solicitor, categorically denying any such activity by the security services, or those working on their behalf. Given that Diana was mother to the future King, and was often at odds with the Royal Family, it is frankly unbelievable that the security forces were taking no interest in her but the official line attempts to deny the obvious.

According to Stephen Dorril's newly published history of Britain's overseas intelligence service, "MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations" (p788):

"... the late Princess of Wales had clearly been under some kind of surveillance, as evidenced by the 1,050-page dossier held by the US National Security Agency detailing private telephone conversations between Diana and American friends intercepted at MI6's request ". (emphasis added)

It is hardly surprising that my efforts to uncover the truth about the Paris crash have made me a lot of enemies. But I have been shocked at the lengths that these people will go to in their attempts to discredit me. The Daily and Sunday Telegraph newspapers, considered by many to be the heart of reactionary opinion in Britain, have mounted an extraordinarily vicious and sustained campaign. Since the crash they have printed a never-ending stream of hostile articles about 150 in all accusing me of everything from tax evasion to sexual harassment. Their fellow-travellers, The Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and the London Evening Standard have joined in the fun. (For a more detailed account, see Mohamed Al Fayed and the Press). While seeking to portray me as some kind of fantasist, they show no interest themselves in establishing the facts. If they are able to prove me wrong, why don't they do so?

The most recent attack on me was The Daily Telegraph's publication of extracts from the book "The Bodyguard's Story" by Trevor Rees-Jones. This account was, in fact, compiled by a committee and crafted by a ghostwriter. It is based substantially on the recollections of others because Rees-Jones himself has no memory of the crash itself and only partial recall of much else. He has simply been used as a vehicle to sensationalise a book which peddles the lies of those hell-bent on silencing me. And he has clearly forgotten completely about the confidentiality clause in his contract of employment with me.

The motives behind the book are plain: they are to clear Trevor and his friend Kez Wingfield, the other bodyguard that night, of all responsibility for the tragedy and also to get "some recompense for what's happened." Everything in the book is shaped by these twin objectives of shifting the blame and selling the book. Trevor is consistently portrayed as a saint while I am relentlessly cast as the evil genius trying to manipulate his memories to support wild conspiracy theories. It is all rubbish and deeply ironic when it is Trevor and those who collaborated with him who are manipulating the truth for their own ends. Trevor has admitted that they lawyers included are all part of the book deal and so will share the profits. Like everyone else, I have the greatest sympathy for Trevor. He went through hell. But I cannot overlook the fact that, on the night, he failed to carry out established security procedures. Had he done so, the couple might be alive today.

Interestingly, the ghostwriter Moira Johnston is best-known for a book on a famous court case concerning so-called "recovered memories." In her third-person narrative, individuals have a startling recall of precisely what they were thinking and saying more than two and a half years ago and, even more remarkable, an exact knowledge of what other people were thinking and saying when key events took place!

Every trick in the book, every tabloid technique known to man, has been employed to fashion a fiction that parades as the truth. I bitterly resent this malicious book and its intrusion on my private family life and security arrangements. I simply cannot understand why I was refused an injunction when Tony Blair was awarded one to stop a book about his family written by a well-intentioned nanny who is a friend of the family! Sometimes the law really is an ass.

The Daily Telegraph and other newspapers have claimed quite wrongly that "The Bodyguard's Story" demolishes many of my theories. In fact, it contains no new information and actually lends weight to my conviction that Henri Paul was not drunk at all. Both Trevor and Kez continue to insist that Paul gave no indication whatsoever of being drunk before he got behind the wheel. They had been with him for extended periods that evening and still maintain that there was nothing in his behaviour or general conduct to suggest that he had been drinking. If this is the case, how then do they account for the inquiry finding that, within three minutes of leaving the hotel, he was more than three times over the drink-drive limit?

The book makes several claims (about the engagement ring and the reported last words of Diana) which are wrong, but otherwise it consists of little more than gossip and innuendo designed to clear the bodyguards of any responsibility for what happened. Despite this, the Establishment has hailed it as a work of great significance. Like the recent revelation that the brother-in-law ofThe Sunday Telegraph editor is a senior MI6 officer , it shows how far the influence of the Establishment extends.

I remain convinced that most fair-minded people believe there was foul play in Paris. Even The Daily Telegraph Home Affairs Editor Philip Johnston was recently forced to acknowledge:

"Since the serialisation began, this newspaper and others connected with the book have been contacted by people who just cannot come to terms with the banal circumstances of the Princess's death. One caller yesterday berated The Daily Telegraph for 'covering up what everyone knows is the truth' ".

Like Trevor Rees-Jones, I too would like to move on and lead a normal life but the Establishment is making that impossible. It is their constant refusal to answer perfectly straightforward questions that drives me on. They should know that the efforts to discredit and destroy me will not succeed and that I will never give up my fight to discover the full facts about the deaths of Dodi and Diana. I am not alone in wanting answers. There is widespread public unease about the circumstances of the tragedy. Very many ordinary people in this country want answers and they deserve them. In my own mind I must be certain that what happened in Paris was truly God's will and not the will of others. I have great faith that God will guide and protect me in my search and I fear no one. I am equally sure that one day the truth will be known.


Court Documents: Fayed vs USA
Visit www.alfayed.com

Latest News Stories

ISOCT

International Story Archives